Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bugfix] Fix uncorrect index file #92

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 8, 2022
Merged

[Bugfix] Fix uncorrect index file #92

merged 2 commits into from Mar 8, 2022

Conversation

jerqi
Copy link
Collaborator

@jerqi jerqi commented Mar 8, 2022

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Modify the method that calculate the offset in the index file.

Why are the changes needed?

If we don't have this patch, we run 10TB tpcds, query24a will fail.
企业微信截图_6dc451cf-dbf4-4257-b680-e79346cd582d
When we write many data to dataOutputStream, dataOutputStream.size() won't increase again. dataOutputStream.size() will
always be Integer.MAX_VALUE.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

Add new uts.

@jerqi jerqi requested review from duanmeng and colinmjj March 8, 2022 06:22
@colinmjj
Copy link
Collaborator

colinmjj commented Mar 8, 2022

@jerqi UT is needed for the bug fix

@jerqi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jerqi commented Mar 8, 2022

@jerqi UT is needed for the bug fix

done

Copy link
Collaborator

@colinmjj colinmjj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, @jerqi, it's a critical bug, please backport to 0.2 & 0.3

@jerqi jerqi merged commit d7f02ea into Tencent:master Mar 8, 2022
jerqi added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify the method that calculate the offset in the index file.

### Why are the changes needed?
If we don't have this patch, we run 10TB tpcds, query24a will fail.
<img width="361" alt="企业微信截图_6dc451cf-dbf4-4257-b680-e79346cd582d" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8159038/157178756-d8a39b3f-0ea6-4864-ac68-ee382a88bb0f.png">
When we write many data to dataOutputStream, dataOutputStream.size() won't increase again. dataOutputStream.size() will
always be Integer.MAX_VALUE.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Add new uts.

Co-authored-by: roryqi <roryqi@tencent.com>
jerqi added a commit to jerqi/Firestorm that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify the method that calculate the offset in the index file.

### Why are the changes needed?
If we don't have this patch, we run 10TB tpcds, query24a will fail.
<img width="361" alt="企业微信截图_6dc451cf-dbf4-4257-b680-e79346cd582d" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8159038/157178756-d8a39b3f-0ea6-4864-ac68-ee382a88bb0f.png">
When we write many data to dataOutputStream, dataOutputStream.size() won't increase again. dataOutputStream.size() will
always be Integer.MAX_VALUE.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Add new uts.

Co-authored-by: roryqi <roryqi@tencent.com>
jerqi added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
backport 0.3.0
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify the method that calculate the offset in the index file.

### Why are the changes needed?
If we don't have this patch, we run 10TB tpcds, query24a will fail.
<img width="361" alt="企业微信截图_6dc451cf-dbf4-4257-b680-e79346cd582d" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8159038/157178756-d8a39b3f-0ea6-4864-ac68-ee382a88bb0f.png">
When we write many data to dataOutputStream, dataOutputStream.size() won't increase again. dataOutputStream.size() will
always be Integer.MAX_VALUE.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Add new uts.

Co-authored-by: roryqi <roryqi@tencent.com>
@jerqi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jerqi commented Mar 8, 2022

LGTM, @jerqi, it's a critical bug, please backport to 0.2 & 0.3

done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants