-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TF_binding_site child terms #466
Comments
Hi Ruth, I am the new postdoc in Karen's lab and I will be helping update the sequence ontology. My background is in human genetics and transcription, so I am now trying to look back at the new issues that have been posted. |
Hi David in addition, I don't know anything about RNA pol I and III promoters, but I have a feeling that probably the definition describes only the RNA pol II core promoter. However, I would like the experts to look at this and make any additional comments before you go ahead and do this. Unfortunately I will not be at the next meeting but Pascale has agreed to present these options at the meeting, which is next week. What do you think about this? Ruth |
Hi Ruth, Thanks for the quick response. I have created a spreadsheet that I have passed to a couple of others working on SO to ask for their help. I have about 5 or 6 other terms you have commented on that also need to be updated. Of particular note for promoter related terms, core_promoter_element currently has no definition. Let me know what they decide about splitting the core promoter element and I will run it by the group and try to update it as soon as I can. Thanks, Dave |
These terms have been updated with the conclusions of the group discussions. |
Rather than giving the dbTF binding site terms a specific regulatory parent (like enhancer) I woudl like to suggest that SO has a structure along these lines:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: