Fix grammar and future-proof against new releases #33
Conversation
There was a grammatical redundancy in the phrase "both the two", so by generalizing the statement to any arbitrary number of .lua files we simultaneously fix this redundancy and future-proof the README against new releases, which might add or subtract a script file.
|
Not sure if trolling... |
|
Why would I be trolling? I plan to submit a few PRs and this was the lowest hanging fruit. Documentation improvements, however trivial, should be welcome. |
|
It's ultimately not my decision, but improvements are generally welcome, I'm sure. |
|
Sure, but that wasn't the point or title of my commit. I simply improved upon the original commit before it was accepted. If I had done that beforehand without making two separate commits, you wouldn't have said anything. You're nitpicking and it's unwelcome, particularly because you're right, it's not your decision at all and you should let the project maintainers make their decision without comments from the peanut gallery. |
|
|
@garoto Are you trying to insinuate something or am I misunderstanding? |
There was a grammatical redundancy in the phrase "both the two", so by generalizing the statement to any arbitrary number of .lua files we simultaneously fix this redundancy and future-proof the README against new releases, which might add or subtract a script file.