Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update 0069-reassertion-fee-reduction.md
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Please merge these changes to helium#458 thank you.
  • Loading branch information
TheRealJohnMac50 committed Aug 27, 2022
1 parent b1010a1 commit ff93fd3
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions 0069-reassertion-fee-reduction.md
Expand Up @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ In stage two, the reassertion fee will be dynamically calculated by what an aver

# Drawbacks

Although the aforementioned gaming prevention methods will drastically reduce the chances of gaming as a result of the reassertion fee reduction, location spoofers may benefit from reduced reassertion fees. Nevertheless, it will be impossible for any given hotspot to benefit from the reasserton fee reduction more than once every 525k blocks (approximately once per year).
Although the aforementioned gaming prevention methods will drastically reduce the chances of gaming as a result of the reassertion fee reduction, location spoofers may benefit from reduced reassertion fees. Nevertheless, it will be impossible for any given hotspot to benefit from the reassertion fee reduction more than once every 525k blocks (approximately once per year).


# Rationale
Expand All @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Not doing this can possibly result in people who may have moved from an over sat

# Unresolved Questions

On the economic effect, burning less HNT as a result of reduced reassertion fees, has a negative economic impact. However, there may end up being more DC burned from more location assertions (than there were prior to the reassertion fee redcution.) Therefore, will this HIP impact the Network's economics negatively or positively?
On the economic effect, burning less HNT as a result of reduced reassertion fees, has a negative economic impact. However, there may end up being more DC burned from more location assertions (than there were prior to the reassertion fee reduction.) Therefore, will this HIP impact the Network's economics negatively or positively?

On the UX side, the non-scoped factors are the work that is needed in various maker apps, ensuring that all hotspots can use the variable rate (depending on the aforementioned equation/logic). Additionally, if a maker decides not to respect the reassertion fee reduction amount, the chain may accept the higher fee amount (which cannot be undone).

Expand Down

0 comments on commit ff93fd3

Please sign in to comment.