Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Don't let = check for undefined. Instead require usage of an is operator. #27

Closed
TheUnlocked opened this issue Apr 12, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Don't let = check for undefined. Instead require usage of an is operator. #27

TheUnlocked opened this issue Apr 12, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
c# Largely involves c# implementation discussion Talk about this issue enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@TheUnlocked
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@TheUnlocked TheUnlocked added enhancement New feature or request discussion Talk about this issue c# Largely involves c# implementation labels Apr 12, 2018
@TheUnlocked
Copy link
Owner Author

This is especially important for when polyary relational operators are implemented (#16) are implemented. is, unlike those, would be binary.

TheUnlocked referenced this issue Apr 21, 2018
Added is operator and patched relational ops
9639f28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c# Largely involves c# implementation discussion Talk about this issue enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@TheUnlocked