Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing parcel in Schaefer 1000 conte69 #10

Closed
royj23 opened this issue Aug 20, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Missing parcel in Schaefer 1000 conte69 #10

royj23 opened this issue Aug 20, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@royj23
Copy link

royj23 commented Aug 20, 2020

Hello! First, thanks for providing this great resource.

Our group is using different versions/resolutions of the Schaefer parcellations, and we noticed that the 1000-node parcellation cifti files seem to be missing a parcel in the right hemisphere. We are using:

  • 'Schaefer2018_1000Parcels_7Networks_order.dlabel.nii': no label 533
  • 'Schaefer2018_1000Parcels_17Networks_order.dlabel.nii' no label 555
    As a result, we find 501 unique labels in the left hemisphere, and only 500 unique labels in the right hemisphere.

All labels seem to be present in the fsaverage5 annotation labels however, with the same number of unique labels in each hemisphere.

Many thanks for your help!

@rubykong
Copy link

@royj23 Actually there should be two parcels missing, one is 533, the other is 903.
The root cause is that the parcellations were created in fsaverage6 space, and for the 1000-ROI parcellation we have this issue in the fslr32k projection that: parcel 533 is missing due to projection and parcel 903 is missing due to the discrepancies in the medial wall area. To make our parcellations consistent across different spaces (MNI, fsaverage, fsLR), we don't want to manually change the order of the parcellation labels.
I thought I have mentioned it somewhere in the readme but clearly I also couldn't find it... Thanks for approaching us! We will modify the readme to reflect this issue.

@royj23
Copy link
Author

royj23 commented Aug 20, 2020

Hi @rubykong , thanks for your quick and informative reply! We'll make note of this on our end :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants