Account for one-based arrays in R when comparing for max capacity #646
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eddelbuettel
requested review from
ihnorton,
aaronwolen,
johnkerl,
awenocur and
mojaveazure
|
This pull request has been linked to Shortcut Story #39116: Small adjustment to #39073. |
johnkerl
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2024
|
Thanks @johnkerl ! By the time I got around to the PR in SOMA I was aware so the '+1' is present there. |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This accounts for a minor off-by-one: when looking at array length in R, 128 is the critical value and not the reported 127. Usual old story of C/C++ being zero based whereas R is one-based. This updates yesterday's PR #645.