Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deletes: implement negate for query condition. #3299

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jul 1, 2022
Merged

Conversation

KiterLuc
Copy link
Contributor

@KiterLuc KiterLuc commented Jun 20, 2022

This adds the ability to negate a query condition for deletes before
serializing to disk.

SC-18803


TYPE: IMPROVEMENT
DESC: Deletes: implement negate for query condition.

@KiterLuc KiterLuc requested a review from ihnorton June 20, 2022 06:59
Copy link
Member

@ihnorton ihnorton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor nit/question inline, and also double-checking: was there a reason to put the constructor implementations in the header?

Otherwise LGTM, the constructor-based implementation looks nice 👍

tiledb/sm/query/ast/query_ast.h Show resolved Hide resolved
@ypatia ypatia self-requested a review July 1, 2022 07:38
tiledb/sm/query/ast/query_ast.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
This adds the ability to negate a query condition for deletes before
serializing to disk.

---
TYPE: IMPROVEMENT
DESC: Deletes: implement negate for query condition.
@KiterLuc KiterLuc force-pushed the lr/qc-negate/sc18803 branch 3 times, most recently from 3494689 to ac475d1 Compare July 1, 2022 08:15
Copy link
Contributor

@ypatia ypatia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, it now looks great

tiledb/sm/query/ast/query_ast.h Show resolved Hide resolved
@KiterLuc KiterLuc merged commit e2c11a6 into dev Jul 1, 2022
@KiterLuc KiterLuc deleted the lr/qc-negate/sc18803 branch July 1, 2022 11:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants