Correct the max hostname length constant. #1012
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
256 bytes including NUL byte is confusing and makes for really annoying bindings to other languages that don't account for NUL bytes in their string length. We pass C strings, not byte arrays, for hostnames, so 255 makes more sense here.
robinlinden
approved these changes
Jul 18, 2018
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r1.
Reviewable status:complete! 1 of 1 LGTMs obtained
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
256 bytes including NUL byte is confusing and makes for really annoying
bindings to other languages that don't account for NUL bytes in their
string length. We pass C strings, not byte arrays, for hostnames, so 255
makes more sense here.
This change is