Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: don't pass garbage data buffer to packet send functions #2541

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

JFreegman
Copy link
Member

@JFreegman JFreegman commented Jan 10, 2024

This garbage data was never looked at due to passing a zero length along with it, but it's still undesirable.


This change is Reviewable

@JFreegman JFreegman added the cleanup Internal code cleanup, possibly affecting semantics, e.g. deleting a deprecated feature. label Jan 10, 2024
@JFreegman JFreegman added this to the v0.2.19 milestone Jan 10, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (32b68cf) 68.96% compared to head (091d123) 68.96%.

❗ Current head 091d123 differs from pull request most recent head ebc9643. Consider uploading reports for the commit ebc9643 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2541   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.96%   68.96%           
=======================================
  Files          96       96           
  Lines       28022    28023    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        19324    19327    +3     
+ Misses       8698     8696    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

This garbage data was never looked at due to passing
a zero length along with it, but it's still undesirable.
@toktok-releaser toktok-releaser merged commit ebc9643 into TokTok:master Jan 10, 2024
52 checks passed
@JFreegman JFreegman deleted the group_fix_garbage_data branch January 10, 2024 17:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cleanup Internal code cleanup, possibly affecting semantics, e.g. deleting a deprecated feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants