Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate msgpack types from serialization details [2/2] #43

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 7, 2018

Conversation

SX91
Copy link

@SX91 SX91 commented Feb 27, 2017

This is the second part of TokTok/hs-msgpack-types#1

This change is Reviewable

Signed-off-by: Anton Kondrachkov <SX91@protonmail.com>
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Feb 27, 2017

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@SX91 SX91 added the enhancement New feature for the user, not a new feature for build script label Feb 27, 2017
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
name: data-msgpack
version: 0.0.9
version: 0.1.0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a minor version bump? Why not 0.0.10?

@iphydf
Copy link
Member

iphydf commented Apr 12, 2017

Please enable the checkbox "Allow edits from maintainers." on the bottom right.

@SX91
Copy link
Author

SX91 commented May 19, 2017

@iphydf It's already checked. And I've fixed version to be a patch bump.

@iphydf
Copy link
Member

iphydf commented Jun 3, 2017

Any idea why appveyor is failing?

@iphydf
Copy link
Member

iphydf commented Jun 3, 2017

:lgtm_strong:


Review status: 0 of 14 files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion, some commit checks failed.


Comments from Reviewable

@iphydf
Copy link
Member

iphydf commented Jun 3, 2017

@SX91 you have push access to this repo, so once it's ready, feel free to merge.

@iphydf
Copy link
Member

iphydf commented Jun 4, 2017

@SX91 turns out, chocolatey is broken. #44 has a fix. Let's release your PR as 0.0.11.

@SX91
Copy link
Author

SX91 commented Sep 1, 2017

So, what about actually merging this?

@robinlinden
Copy link
Member

:lgtm_strong:


Reviewed 13 of 14 files at r1, 1 of 1 files at r5.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion, all commit checks successful.


Comments from Reviewable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature for the user, not a new feature for build script
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants