-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PowerMethod will produce slightly different results for every call #806
Comments
Yes, should be seeded for reproducibility.
…On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 09:03, evelinaametova ***@***.***> wrote:
Assigned #806 <https://github.com/vais-ral/CCPi-Framework/issues/806> to
@jakobsj <https://github.com/jakobsj>.
—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/vais-ral/CCPi-Framework/issues/806#event-4488498790>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACMDSCHBBH7HSU3DYHSEHE3TE32VJANCNFSM4ZSTJEHA>
.
|
Suggest to add a new CIL/Wrappers/Python/cil/optimisation/operators/Operator.py Lines 154 to 167 in 3e29c5b
to create |
In #1645 we found that we needed a random seed for the power method tests! It would be good to be able to set the random seed in the argument of the power method |
https://github.com/vais-ral/CCPi-Framework/blob/598f758d660e9da92878d6819502321cb7c2b09e/Wrappers/Python/cil/optimisation/operators/Operator.py#L134
Shouldn't this random allocation be seeded? If not seeded, reconstructions with exactly the same input will produce slightly different results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: