Consider the room with a tower not blocked if it was unclaimed by oneself #682
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
TooAngel
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2023
|
This pull request was merged by worlddriven. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The creeps shouldn't consider the room with tower blocked as long as its owner is oneself. This could be useful in following situation:
Room A | Room B | Room C
If you have room C as your base room, and you claimed room B, built a tower in room B.
And at some time you want room A, but you only get 2 GCL, then room B must be unclaimed.
If you forget to destroy the tower in room B, the bot will maybe never reach room A (without my changes, if no other routes)!
Then consider the tower's owner. Even if a room is not owned by the user, the tower could be harmless.