You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. Thanks for the library and congrats for the greats work.
In the drift_detection_on_images notebook you mention that the p-value being exactly zero is an artifact from the bootstrapping we use for computing the p-value.. Can you elaborate a bit further? I am facing this occurrence. Is it problematic? I tried to increase the n_perm in the kernel_mmd( ) function, but I am still getting the same result. I guess what I'm asking is if this means my results are unreliable, i.e., that drift did in fact not occur the 0. p value I'm getting is not a true reflection of the data.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sofiapvcp
changed the title
drift_detection_on_images notebook clarification
drift_detection_on_images notebook clarification- P-value bootstrapping
Apr 4, 2023
Hi. Thanks for the library and congrats for the greats work.
In the drift_detection_on_images notebook you mention that the p-value being exactly zero
is an artifact from the bootstrapping we use for computing the p-value.
. Can you elaborate a bit further? I am facing this occurrence. Is it problematic? I tried to increase the n_perm in the kernel_mmd( ) function, but I am still getting the same result. I guess what I'm asking is if this means my results are unreliable, i.e., that drift did in fact not occur the 0. p value I'm getting is not a true reflection of the data.Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: