We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/nmpfps.log#L1056
frahdf.a016cha HDF/IDF (49.164654,2.231284) NMP fraidf.d030195ron HDF/IDF (49.164841,2.231735)
but https://travelmapping.net/logs/nearmisspoints.log says:
fraidf.a014 4 (48.895054,2.227821) NMP fraidf.d002392 BlvdAimeCes_N (48.89471,2.227596) [MARKED FP] fraidf.a016cha HDF/IDF (49.164654,2.231284) NMP fraidf.d030195ron HDF/IDF (49.164841,2.231735) fraidf.a086 +X36 (48.892289,2.181859) NMP fraidf.d098692 +X86 (48.892289,2.181858) [LOOKS INTENTIONAL] [MARKED FP]
A16Cha should have a [MARKED FP] suffix but it hasn't. I don't get why.
[MARKED FP]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The HDF points are also marked FP. I'm stumped...
Sorry, something went wrong.
frahdf vs fraidf
IDF NMP FPs
7d5fd96
TravelMapping/DataProcessing#346
Thanks 😃 I marked the HDF entries by accident. Added the IDF entries now.
No branches or pull requests
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/nmpfps.log#L1056
frahdf.a016cha HDF/IDF (49.164654,2.231284) NMP fraidf.d030195ron HDF/IDF (49.164841,2.231735)
but https://travelmapping.net/logs/nearmisspoints.log says:
A16Cha should have a
[MARKED FP]
suffix but it hasn't. I don't get why.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: