Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NMP: FP still indicated as error [Bug/Question] #346

Closed
michihdeu opened this issue Jun 28, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

NMP: FP still indicated as error [Bug/Question] #346

michihdeu opened this issue Jun 28, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@michihdeu
Copy link
Contributor

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/nmpfps.log#L1056

frahdf.a016cha HDF/IDF (49.164654,2.231284) NMP fraidf.d030195ron HDF/IDF (49.164841,2.231735)

but https://travelmapping.net/logs/nearmisspoints.log says:

fraidf.a014 4 (48.895054,2.227821) NMP fraidf.d002392 BlvdAimeCes_N (48.89471,2.227596) [MARKED FP]
fraidf.a016cha HDF/IDF (49.164654,2.231284) NMP fraidf.d030195ron HDF/IDF (49.164841,2.231735)
fraidf.a086 +X36 (48.892289,2.181859) NMP fraidf.d098692 +X86 (48.892289,2.181858) [LOOKS INTENTIONAL] [MARKED FP]

A16Cha should have a [MARKED FP] suffix but it hasn't. I don't get why.

@michihdeu
Copy link
Contributor Author

The HDF points are also marked FP. I'm stumped...

@yakra
Copy link
Contributor

yakra commented Jun 29, 2020

frahdf vs fraidf

michihdeu added a commit to michihdeu/HighwayData that referenced this issue Jun 29, 2020
@michihdeu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks 😃 I marked the HDF entries by accident. Added the IDF entries now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants