Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Options to include devel systems, exclude preview #64

Closed
jteresco opened this issue Jun 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Options to include devel systems, exclude preview #64

jteresco opened this issue Jun 4, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement Highway Browser This label has been replaced by findroute and showroute

Comments

@jteresco
Copy link
Contributor

jteresco commented Jun 4, 2016

Soon we'll see both active and preview systems on most of the web front end pages. I'd like to add options to exclude preview when someone wants to do so, and include devel. The latter doesn't make sense for pages dealing with clinched segments, as the site update ignores any entries in list files for devel systems, but it might make sense to be able to include them on some maps to allow highway data contributors and peer reviewers to see them in another way.

@michihdeu
Copy link
Contributor

It should generally be possible all over the site to select a minimum system status level.: devel, preview or active.

@jteresco
Copy link
Contributor Author

jteresco commented Jun 2, 2020

I feel like we've moved past this. OK to close?

@michihdeu
Copy link
Contributor

I think it was desired to exclude preview systems back in 2016 (not by me!).
My wish to include devel systems is obsolete now.

I tend to closing.

@michihdeu michihdeu added the Highway Browser This label has been replaced by findroute and showroute label Jun 2, 2020
@jteresco jteresco closed this as completed Jul 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Highway Browser This label has been replaced by findroute and showroute
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants