You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Until now, the idea of having a monorepo with multiple packages (core, cientos, ...) was to iterate fast on the library and mostly make it stable. And it worked.
Although, the release management has been completely manual and inefficient.
Thinking of the future, when we open the project, all the features, discussions, and bugs of all the packages would live inside the same mono repo, which would create a maintenance overhead and possible noise.
Also considering that cientos would be potentially huge in terms of features, controlled by the core team but maintained mostly by the community, it only makes sense to separate into different repos
Scope
The scope of this task is to:
Convert core to a simple repo
Move cientos to a separate repo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
alvarosabu
changed the title
Convert core to normal repo
Separate monorepo in different repos.
Mar 14, 2023
Until now, the idea of having a monorepo with multiple packages (core, cientos, ...) was to iterate fast on the library and mostly make it stable. And it worked.
Although, the release management has been completely manual and inefficient.
Thinking of the future, when we open the project, all the features, discussions, and bugs of all the packages would live inside the same mono repo, which would create a maintenance overhead and possible noise.
Also considering that
cientos
would be potentially huge in terms of features, controlled by the core team but maintained mostly by the community, it only makes sense to separate into different reposScope
The scope of this task is to:
cientos
to a separate repoThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: