Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: integrates bloom filter in tribler (from py-ipv8) #4503

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jdonszelmann
Copy link
Member

As far as i could see, this resolves all references to the bloom filter from pyipv8 and redirects them to an implementation in tribler. I am not completely sure where i should put it (it's in core now). Input is appreciated. As promised in Tribler/py-ipv8#477

@tribler-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@devos50
Copy link
Contributor

devos50 commented May 18, 2019

ok to test

@devos50 devos50 changed the title integrates bloom filter in tribler (from py-ipv8) WIP: integrates bloom filter in tribler (from py-ipv8) May 18, 2019
@jdonszelmann
Copy link
Member Author

oh whoops, i totally forgot to also add the tests from py-ipv8 for the bloom filter. Right now only the code itself is added (that is why coverage fails). Should i add now or wait until you figure out if it should be there at all / refactored (Tribler/py-ipv8#477)

@qstokkink
Copy link
Contributor

@devos50 as the market is still in, should we merge this now?

@devos50
Copy link
Contributor

devos50 commented May 30, 2019

@jonay2000 could you move the Bloomfilter class to the Tribler.community.market module (since the market is the only component that actually uses the bloomfilter)?

Also, I will remove the market implementation from Tribler and add the submodule instead as soon as possible. 👍

@jdonszelmann
Copy link
Member Author

I am currently on holiday so I'll try to get it done by Monday. I'm sorry.

@devos50
Copy link
Contributor

devos50 commented Jun 10, 2019

Superseded by #4547

@devos50 devos50 closed this Jun 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants