Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(Aura / Stacking) Ferocious Inspiration / Sanctified Retribution / Arcane Empowerment #6447

Closed
EnteringCombat opened this issue May 5, 2012 · 10 comments
Assignees

Comments

@EnteringCombat
Copy link

Hello,
Please notice that the previous issue presented regarding those auras stacking was lacking alot of information.

FI = Ferocious Inspiration, SR = Sanctified Retribution, AE = Arcane Empowerment
There's an existing problem with the following auras stacking:
FI (Beast Mastery hunter) aura stacks with SR (Retribution Paladin talent) along with AE (Arcane Mage's aura).

What should happen:
-The raid must benefit from one aura and gain 3% damage, even if all three auras are available in the raid by the three following classes with the given specs. (Notice how Retribution Aura should be a buff anyhow, but shouldn't boost 3% additional damage if a BM/Arcane mage are in the raid).

What happens instead:
-The raid benefits from all three auras, having FI and AE auras stacking together while only one of them should be active as a buff for raid members.
Notice that SR is a talent that boosts the Retribution Aura. This means that a retadin with this talent should still give the raid the Retribution Aura buff , but this aura shouldn't boost the raid's damage by 3% as long as there's an arcane mage or a BM hunter presence in the raid.

Bottom line - the raid gains 3% damage from FI, 3% damage from AE, and 3% damage from SR.
Relevant links:
Sanctified Retribution - http://wotlk.openwow.com/?spell=31869
Ferocious Inspiration 3/3 - http://wotlk.openwow.com/?spell=34460
Arcane Empowerment 3/3 - http://wotlk.openwow.com/?spell=31583

We use hash a8a5b5a
Thanks in advance,
EnteringCombat.

@durrrr
Copy link

durrrr commented May 5, 2012

duplicate of:
#4295

@Pitcrawler
Copy link
Contributor

To fix this there should be an entry in spell_group table containing the three spells. Then there should be an additional entry in spell_group_stack_rules table with stack rule SPELL_GROUP_STACK_RULE_EXCLUSIVE_SAME_EFFECT = 3.
That way all the group-/raidmembers will have the buffs but the 3% damage increase won't stack.

@EnteringCombat
Copy link
Author

The report linked above by durrrr was closed, furthermore lacking information regarding SR.

@Amit86
Copy link
Contributor

Amit86 commented May 5, 2012

DELETE FROM spell_group WHERE id=1056;
INSERT INTO spell_group VALUES
(1056,31583),
(1056,31869),
(1056,34460);

DELETE FROM spell_group_stack_rules WHERE group_id=1056;
INSERT INTO spell_group_stack_rules VALUES
(1056,3);

Tried this - Didn't work.. any other advise?

@Pitcrawler
Copy link
Contributor

Checked the spell effects and as they are different for the three spells spell_group was a bad idea... Sorry about that

@Xanvial
Copy link
Contributor

Xanvial commented May 7, 2012

i think we should use spell that linked to the talents which give damage % mod only
like http://wotlk.openwow.com/?spell=75447 (Ferocious Inspiration rank 3)
and use group stack rules 1

@Pitcrawler
Copy link
Contributor

Hm nice catch but I'm not sure about stack rule 1. If we set it that way all party and raidmembers will only have one of these auras on them. I think on retail everyone would have all three auras (if there is a player in the group/raid with this talent specced) but there would be just a 3% damage increase in total. And that is what stack rule 3 is for.

Can anyone test this

DELETE FROM `spell_group` WHERE `id`=1117;
INSERT INTO `spell_group` (`id`,`spell_id`) VALUES
(1117,31579),
(1117,63531),
(1117,75446),
(1117,75447),
(1117,75593);

DELETE FROM `spell_group_stack_rules` WHERE `group_id`=1117;
INSERT INTO `spell_group_stack_rules` (`group_id`,`stack_rule`) VALUES
(1117,3);

@Star-lion
Copy link
Contributor

stack rule 3 is having some issues. once its fixed all these will work

@ghost ghost assigned Star-lion May 7, 2012
@Aokromes
Copy link
Member

This was fixed no?

@Lat89
Copy link

Lat89 commented Sep 27, 2012

Nope, not fixed, newer report here #7667

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants