Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added changeUserFraction that change userFraction #110

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shiraji
Copy link
Contributor

@shiraji shiraji commented Oct 22, 2015

see #104

This one may conflict with #108

@shiraji shiraji changed the title [WIP] Try to implement changeUserFraction Added changeUserFraction that change userFraction Oct 22, 2015
@shiraji
Copy link
Contributor Author

shiraji commented Oct 22, 2015

@bhurling Could you check this pull request? Thanks.

I haven't implement a function that passes user fraction as a command line option, since that might affect the current userFraction.

@rocboronat
Copy link
Contributor

@shiraji do you think this PR #133 is useful for you?

@shiraji
Copy link
Contributor Author

shiraji commented Apr 13, 2016

I think you are asking this to the wrong person. I'm not maintainer or collaborator of this plugin.

@rocboronat
Copy link
Contributor

@shiraji well, but the PR is directly related with the feature you added. I mean, you could merge that branch into this PR and go forward in a tested way :·)

@@ -47,4 +49,14 @@ class PlayPublishTask extends DefaultTask {
}
}

def getTrackByName(String trackName) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This can be written in a more Groovy-ish way:

    def getTrackByName(String trackName) {
        def tracksList = edits.tracks().list(variant.applicationId, editId).execute()
        return tracksList.getTracks().find { it.getTrack() == trackName }
    }

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before fixing this code, I would like you guys ( @ChristianBecker @bhurling ) discuss about where this plugin goes.

As far as I remember, @bhurling didn't want to add some features that are not related with gradle build process (#108 and #110). Here is the comments.

#109 (comment)
#109 (comment)

If you guys decide merging this in, I would fix this and the conflicts as soon as possible.

@SUPERCILEX
Copy link
Collaborator

Gonna leave this one open since we haven't decided on pursuing the issue or not internally, but the Kotlin rewrite is still going to kill it.

@SUPERCILEX
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing since the Kotlin rewrite has been merged and this PR is now obsolete.

@SUPERCILEX SUPERCILEX closed this May 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants