Remove art.classifiers and art.wrappers

[beat-buesser]

Signed-off-by: Beat Buesser beat.buesser@ie.ibm.com

Description

This pull request removes deprecated art.classifiers and art.wrappers.

• tools of art.wrappers.expectation have been replaced with tools in art.preprocessing.expectation_over_transformation
• tools of art.wrappers.query_efficient_bb have been replaced with tools in art.estimators
• art.classifiers has been replaced with art.estimators.classification

Fixes #1195 #65

Type of change

Please check all relevant options.

• Improvement (non-breaking)
• Bug fix (non-breaking)
• New feature (non-breaking)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1256 (878cce7) into dev_1.8.0 (56a9fad) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           dev_1.8.0    #1256      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      81.32%   81.31%   -0.01%     
=============================================
  Files            229      226       -3     
  Lines          19350    19284      -66     
  Branches        3505     3499       -6     
=============================================
- Hits           15736    15681      -55     
+ Misses          2313     2305       -8     
+ Partials        1301     1298       -3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
art/estimators/classification/blackbox.py	95.09% <ø> (ø)
art/estimators/classification/catboost.py	87.50% <ø> (ø)
...t/estimators/classification/detector_classifier.py	95.78% <ø> (ø)
art/estimators/classification/lightgbm.py	81.69% <ø> (ø)
art/estimators/classification/mxnet.py	74.83% <ø> (ø)
art/estimators/classification/scikitlearn.py	86.64% <ø> (ø)
art/estimators/classification/xgboost.py	85.85% <ø> (ø)
art/utils.py	74.08% <ø> (ø)
art/estimators/classification/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...rt/estimators/classification/query_efficient_bb.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 1 more

[GiulioZizzo]

Hi Beat, many thanks for the review. The proposed changes look good to me!

[beat-buesser]

Hi @GiulioZizzo Thank you very much!