Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Google Sheets embeds are too small (Integrations) #507

Closed
kymellis opened this issue Dec 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Google Sheets embeds are too small (Integrations) #507

kymellis opened this issue Dec 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@kymellis
Copy link

kymellis commented Dec 4, 2018

I am working on the Integrations page for Google Sheets + Ghost, explaining how to embed a spreadsheet into a Ghost post. This is great for people who want to embed dynamic data or swipe files that their readers can export from their site.

Screenshot

When I use the Google Sheets embed code in a card, it renders very small in Casper:
google sheets embed

This is not a usable working example of this embed and should fit to the width of the content. In order to publish this integration, it needs to be compatible with Casper.

Note: the integration content is saved as a draft in the Docs Ghost instance.

@kymellis
Copy link
Author

kymellis commented Jan 2, 2019

@peterzimon found another one of these when moving our podcast embeds from SoundCloud to Backtracks. Live example here. It should look like this.

Some of these integrations are ones I'm working on because people have reached out to us, so if you could let me know when this progresses that would be great :)

@kymellis
Copy link
Author

kymellis commented Jan 3, 2019

@peterzimon scratch the above example - for some reason yesterday pasting the embeddable Backtracks URL into the editor didn't work so I used the embed code in a card instead. It works now and the player renders at the correct size using the OEmbed integration.

It's still an issue for some of the other integrations - but not a major road-block for this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants