Add information on methods for mcse

[rikhuijzer]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #16 (ea77f1f) into main (c5125f4) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #16   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.39%   94.39%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         553      553           
=======================================
  Hits          522      522           
  Misses         31       31           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/mcse.jl	100.00% <ø> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c5125f4...ea77f1f. Read the comment docs.

[rikhuijzer]

Thanks for the feedback, David. Let me know if I can also update the MCMCChains docs. I'm not sure what you want with that exactly. For me, closing that PR is also fine if you plan to merge the migration to InferenceDiagnostics.jl soon(ish).

[rikhuijzer]

According to Benjamin Deonovic on Slack. The methods are based on other calculations. Don't merge yet, I'll add refs.

[rikhuijzer]

Okay. Updated it. Are the refs okay like this? I see that you also use

**references**

[...]

but that isn't so useful here. Alternatively, we can move the docs in the different methods and add a bunch of [mcse_bm](@ref) etc

[devmotion]

I think it's fine as it is. IIRC I did not use cross references since I was not satisfied with the Documenter output (e.g., there are issues with references that appear in different docstrings (JuliaDocs/Documenter.jl#566) but maybe this is not an issue anymore since I removed the references from FFTESSMethod).

[devmotion]

Thanks for the feedback, David. Let me know if I can also update the MCMCChains docs. I'm not sure what you want with that exactly. For me, closing that PR is also fine if you plan to merge the migration to InferenceDiagnostics.jl soon(ish).

I plan to register the package within the next days (#2 (comment)) and there is already a PR for MCMCChains, so I assume the migration can be completed until the end of next week. So maybe we can just wait until end of next week and merge the PR to MCMCChains only if it is not fixed until then?

[rikhuijzer]

Thanks for the feedback, David. Let me know if I can also update the MCMCChains docs. I'm not sure what you want with that exactly. For me, closing that PR is also fine if you plan to merge the migration to InferenceDiagnostics.jl soon(ish).

I plan to register the package within the next days (#2 (comment)) and there is already a PR for MCMCChains, so I assume the migration can be completed until the end of next week. So maybe we can just wait until end of next week and merge the PR to MCMCChains only if it is not fixed until then?

Completely fine by me :) I'll just close the other PR for now.

[devmotion]

Thanks for the PR!