You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Auto-Scale works fine when attaching (stack or radial) a Part with scalar scaled (currently only Meters) parts on other scalar scaled Part - ie, a fuel tank on another.
However, normalized or percentage scaled parts mimics the relative scale of the target part - what works well when you are attaching things on similar sized (and also scaled) parts. But became a bit cumbersome when the target is a big and unscaled part. See image below:
The Mk0 LF Tank was attached over am unscaled Kerbodyne S3-14400 Tank, and was scaled up appropriately. A R11 Baguette was radially attached to it, and since the Mk0 was scaled up 4 times, the Baguette followed suit into 400%.
But when attached to the S3-14400, since it's on the default size, so the Baguette gets attached on 100% too.
This schema works, but perhaps something more convenient can be achieved somehow?
Something to think about.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That's the issue:
Auto-Scale works fine when attaching (stack or radial) a Part with scalar scaled (currently only Meters) parts on other scalar scaled Part - ie, a fuel tank on another.
However, normalized or percentage scaled parts mimics the relative scale of the target part - what works well when you are attaching things on similar sized (and also scaled) parts. But became a bit cumbersome when the target is a big and unscaled part. See image below:
The
Mk0 LF Tank
was attached over am unscaledKerbodyne S3-14400 Tank
, and was scaled up appropriately. AR11 Baguette
was radially attached to it, and since theMk0
was scaled up 4 times, theBaguette
followed suit into 400%.But when attached to the
S3-14400
, since it's on the default size, so the Baguette gets attached on 100% too.This schema works, but perhaps something more convenient can be achieved somehow?
Something to think about.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: