feat(TU-9756): support no-scrollbars flag #644
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
[BOT] Preview available with hash |
mathio
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2024
typeform-ops-gha
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2024
# [@typeform/embed-v4.9.0](https://github.com/Typeform/embed/compare/@typeform/embed-v4.8.1...@typeform/embed-v4.9.0) (2024-03-18) ### Features * **TU-9756:** support no-scrollbars flag ([#644](#644)) ([c7d8e70](c7d8e70))
|
🎉 This PR is included in version @typeform/embed-v4.9.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi there! This piece of work intends to fix a glitch that can be observed with the following conditions:
autoResizeonWhen changing the parent window width, the typeform will recalculate sizes and word-wrapping, which can get the user in the following loop:
In some cases, this is reproducible in Chrome over Mac as well, but I got the worst glitch testing it in Windows 10 w/Chromium 122 & derivatives