Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial Version of Scenario definition and other associated amendments needed for the "Horizontal vs Vertical"-type Analysis, #1288

Open
wants to merge 198 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tbhallett
Copy link
Collaborator

@tbhallett tbhallett commented Mar 4, 2024

Developments to enable next generation of analyses, wherein we modify sets of parameters representing "Health System Strengthening" interventions and "Expansion of Vertical Programs". This is needed for the FCDO/GF analysis and planned ROI of HSS.

Includes giving the ScenarioSwitcher the functionality to make changes midway through the simulation.

…ty as small population size over 7 days will not schedule VMMC through HIV module. Remove HIV_Prevention_Circumcision in assert statement for HIV services delivered in one week
# Conflicts:
#	resources/malaria/ResourceFile_malaria.xlsx
#	src/tlo/methods/hiv.py
#	src/tlo/methods/malaria.py
# Conflicts:
#	resources/ResourceFile_Improved_Healthsystem_And_Healthcare_Seeking.xlsx
#	resources/healthsystem/priority_policies/ResourceFile_PriorityRanking_ALLPOLICIES.xlsx
#	src/tlo/methods/malaria.py
#	tests/test_malaria.py
# Conflicts:
#	resources/ResourceFile_HIV.xlsx
#	src/tlo/methods/hiv.py
@tbhallett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

now merging in :

@tbhallett
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tbhallett commented Jun 27, 2024

JOB_ID of run of src/scripts/comparison_of_horizontal_and_vertical_programs/scenario_vertical_programs_with_and_without_hss.py is:

htm_with_and_without_hss-2024-06-27T162216Z

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
PR priorities
Ready for EM review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants