You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @nreimers
I've been using the msmarco-distilbert-dot-v5 model for asymmetric search and QnA retrieval.
I recently came across the models that were created during the Community Jax/Flax week.
Was wondering if these Jax models (for eg. the multi_qa_distilbert) give better results in asymmetric and answer retrieval compared to the msmarco-distilbert.
Or are the models listed in sbert's MSMarco page the best for this usecase?
My dataset is mostly non-technical, oriented more towards philosophy, religion etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
regstuff
changed the title
Using JAX models for asymmetric search?
Using JAX models for asymmetric search & Answer Retrieval?
Nov 23, 2022
Yes, multi-qa models perform better than ms marco models
Thanks for the info. Was wondering if there's any table comparing performance of these models, similar to what exists for the MS Marco models.
There are multiple JAX models, and I'm having a hard time figuring out which one I should use.
A related question: Is it alright to use the dot product models if my distance metric for similarity is euclidean distance? I'm using Scikit's BallTree to find knn, and it does not provide dotproduct as an option. So I am using Euclidean distance.
Hi @nreimers
I've been using the msmarco-distilbert-dot-v5 model for asymmetric search and QnA retrieval.
I recently came across the models that were created during the Community Jax/Flax week.
Was wondering if these Jax models (for eg. the multi_qa_distilbert) give better results in asymmetric and answer retrieval compared to the msmarco-distilbert.
Or are the models listed in sbert's MSMarco page the best for this usecase?
My dataset is mostly non-technical, oriented more towards philosophy, religion etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: