Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is the correct way to build and run cctm with parallel io? #195

Closed
Roadelse opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

What is the correct way to build and run cctm with parallel io? #195

Roadelse opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Roadelse
Copy link

Roadelse commented Jun 7, 2023

Description
I tried to build and run CMAQ-5.4.0.2/CCTM using parallel io, and encountered runtime MPI errors, e.g., Invalid communicator, error stack
So I wonder what is the wrong through my steps below?

  1. build zlib and hdf5 (enable-parallel)
  2. build netcdf-c and netcdf-fortran with nc4 enabled and pnetcdf disabled (due to official doc)
  3. build pnetcdf
  4. build ioapi with netcdf-c, netcdf-fortran and pnetcdf
  5. build CCTM with -Dparallel_io (succeed to compile)
  6. download 2018 Bencharmark input
  7. change run*script, adding "MPI:" before CCTM output filename
  8. qsub the script
    then, the program corrupt in opening CONC file
    So, did I do sth. wrong which leads to error in running CCTM....exe?
@kmfoley
Copy link
Collaborator

kmfoley commented Jun 8, 2023

Hi @Roadelse, Thank you for your interest in the Parallel I/O option in CMAQ. David Wong @dwongepa is the developer of CMAQ PIO and may be able to offer a solution for the problem you have encountered. You can contact him directly at wong.david-c@epa.gov.

May we also ask that you please post additional questions and issues about CMAQ on our Users' Forum: https://forum.cmascenter.org/
We use this forum for CMAQ questions because it has search and tagging features that make it easier for users to find answers to their questions and get connected to the appropriate developer.

@kmfoley kmfoley closed this as completed Jun 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants