-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 302
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature] Support for detecting tick marks or cross marks #167
Comments
I'd like to give this a shot! |
Hello @alt-shreya, feel free to propose a basic solution/approach. Then I will assign the issue to you :) |
@Udayraj123 I went through the resources you had linked, and found the StackOverflow discussion very interesting. |
Hey @alt-shreya, thanks for taking forward the discussion.
|
yes
Could you give me an example of when it might shift? |
I don't have images with tick marks handy, but I think the following will suffice. Here's a few examples for the general shifting problem - ![]() Try to imagine tick marks instead of the bubbles in above image. For filled bubbles we use the mean value for the whole box which usually works, so we ignore any slight shifts in the image in current approach. But this mean value approach also fails sometimes for in cases like this (false positive) - |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It'll be good to have support for tick marks/cross marks instead of just fully circled bubbles.
Describe the solution you'd like
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: