New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Slicing defects #16714
Comments
Thanks for the report. Someone from the Cura team will take a look. |
Thanks for the feedback. I was too lazy to search for similar posts. I
should have guessed that it was already in there. I rolled back to 5.3.1
for now.
…On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 5:10 PM GregValiant ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for the report.
The imperfections I see in the print I believe have been reported
previously. Unfortunately I can't remember the title of the report. I do
remember seeing those imperfections and I investigated and found that they
do show up in the gcode.
Someone from the Cura team will take a look.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#16714 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEMFKDBUQYM2NGCF63QTNA3XZ6R5VANCNFSM6AAAAAA4TV5PUM>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Try lowering the |
Thanks - that fixes it. There are so many settings that I've never looked
at.
…--Kevin
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 1:54 PM Aldo Hoeben ***@***.***> wrote:
Try lowering the Maximum Resolution setting (under Mesh Fixes) to 0.2.
This has fixed similar reports, but I don't quite understand why it would
be necessary in newer versions of Cura.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#16714 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEMFKDCEGFTGSQHKF3MX3PDX2DDYNANCNFSM6AAAAAA4TV5PUM>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Actually, 0.2 fixed most of the problems, but a few spots still have some
small defects. 0.1 seems to clean up those.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 2:17 PM Kevin Jones ***@***.***>
wrote:
… Thanks - that fixes it. There are so many settings that I've never looked
at.
--Kevin
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 1:54 PM Aldo Hoeben ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Try lowering the Maximum Resolution setting (under Mesh Fixes) to 0.2.
> This has fixed similar reports, but I don't quite understand why it would
> be necessary in newer versions of Cura.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#16714 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEMFKDCEGFTGSQHKF3MX3PDX2DDYNANCNFSM6AAAAAA4TV5PUM>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
Cura Version
5.4.0
Operating System
Windows 10
Printer
S5
Reproduction steps
If I slice the same part with the same settings in 5.3.1 and 5.4.0, the part sliced in 5.4.0 has occasional defects at random layers, where it seems to drop points in the path, yielding jagged defects.
Actual results
Areas that are smooth in CAD, and smooth when sliced in Cura 5.3.1 are jagged when sliced in Cura 5.4.0
Expected results
I would not expect the above behavior
Add your .zip and screenshots here ⬇️
STL.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: