Fix masked array issue in equivalent potential temperature #1426
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jthielen
added
Type: Bug
|
If it needs to go in 0.12.2, we should put it in that milestone. |
dopplershift
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description Of Changes
Fixes the equivalent potential temperature issue noted in #1364 with masked arrays by not reconstructing quantity with multiplication (instead, reconstructing directly).
Tagging this for 1.0 (and basing on master branch), but should probably get cherry-picked for 0.12.2 as well?
Replaces #1373 due to needing to recreate my MetPy fork.
Checklist