Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 9, 2020. It is now read-only.

Notes from Albany #418

Closed
dopplershift opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Notes from Albany #418

dopplershift opened this issue Jun 4, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@dopplershift
Copy link
Member

General notes from the last workshop, with a few possible actions:

  • Drop some/all of Jupyter — can pick up from videos, many people experienced
  • Drop Conda? In favor of explanation of overall ecosystem, motivating why we cover each. General workflow?
  • Current normal Day 1 is overloaded
  • Would be great to come up with a set of “put it all together exercises”
  • Matplotlib allocation is off from what’s in the notebook
zbruick added a commit to zbruick/python-workshop that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2019
@zbruick
Copy link
Contributor

zbruick commented Aug 5, 2019

The only remaining item that hasn't been addressed is the "put it all together" exercises. I don't know if we need that for Valpo, or if we should just open that as a separate issue for longer-term development?

@dopplershift
Copy link
Member Author

If a good general exercise comes to mind, we can look at including it for Valpo. Otherwise, let's just pull it out into its own issue.

If @kgoebber has any ideas, that would be welcome as well.

@kgoebber
Copy link
Contributor

kgoebber commented Aug 5, 2019

I don't have any big ideas right off the top of my head, but to some extent the QG Analysis notebook brings together a number of different aspects: data acquisition, data computation, and data plotting on a map. Another example was the case study piece that we did for the AMS workshop in 2018 (I think) as that brought together skew-T, Satellite, and model output.

I agree that this should be opened as a separate issue to iterate on to develop some good "pull it all together" exercises. Thinking problem-based might help with identifying interesting examples.

@zbruick
Copy link
Contributor

zbruick commented Aug 5, 2019

Thanks for the input! I think a case study would be the obvious solution here, but something problem-based that maybe could be tweaked for the audience would be useful overall. I've opened #437 to handle this topic and we can iterate on it over there.

I'm closing this issue, since we'll handle the remaining issue in #437, as discussed.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants