Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update SNMP forwarding/proxying examples in docker-compose environment #2516

Merged

Conversation

lunkwill42
Copy link
Member

As mentioned in #2435, there already existed some undocumented examples of how to achieve SNMP proxying in the Docker Compose based development environment.

Since I recently had the need to use SNMP proxying to reach a closed-off network, I found an opportunity to clean up the examples.

This complements #2435 - and perhaps #2435 can be updated to mention these examples.

This moves the SNMP forwarding/proxy service examples from
docker-compose.yml to docker-compose.snmp.yml, and adds more comments to
clarify how it can be set up and used.
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 25, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@github-actions
Copy link

Test results

     12 files       12 suites   10m 39s ⏱️
3 111 tests 3 015 ✔️   96 💤 0
8 808 runs  8 520 ✔️ 288 💤 0

Results for commit 9c16e79.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #2516 (9c16e79) into master (fe217e2) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2516   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   53.31%   53.31%           
=======================================
  Files         554      554           
  Lines       40315    40315           
=======================================
  Hits        21494    21494           
  Misses      18821    18821           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Copy link
Contributor

@johannaengland johannaengland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After a lot of struggling and troubleshooting (which I will mention in #2435) I finally got this to work!

@johannaengland johannaengland merged commit e94023b into Uninett:master Mar 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants