-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Does "use"/"using" always evoke a scene? #36
Comments
I would say the first 3 don't evoke a scene (instruments), while the last
one has two Scenes with a purposive Linker. I agree "used' could be
analyzed as a secondary verb, but my feeling is that this option will be
less immediate for annotators.
…On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:58 AM Nathan Schneider ***@***.***> wrote:
Consider:
1. He broke the window *with* a hammer. – seems like "with a hammer"
is a clear participant
2. He broke the window *using* a hammer.
3. He broke the window *by using* a hammer. – "by" presents the use of
the hammer as a means
4. He *used* a hammer to break the window.
[He_A used_P [a hammer]_A [(He)_A to break_P [the window]_A]_A – this
analysis seems reasonable, but I could also see an argument that "used" is
a secondary verb.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#36>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIG86wZy2yC3lI_kXe5K8wIvG94z-v_nks5ugtZGgaJpZM4XDPY7>
.
|
Would you make "using" a relator in (2)? What about (3)? |
Yes. Relator. I agree (3) is borderline between a Scene and not a Scene.
|
So with the non-scene interpretation of (3), both "by" and "using" would be relators? |
yes
…On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:38 PM Nathan Schneider ***@***.***> wrote:
So with the non-scene interpretation of (3), both "by" and "using" would
be relators?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#36 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIG860i0JbIO2pMHNo0AHLbenlu9KiV0ks5ug8DSgaJpZM4XDPY7>
.
|
Dotan, could you add these as examples to the guidelines? |
Added these examples under "instruments" (do you agree with this title or have a better idea?) in "interesting examples". |
Sounds good
בתאריך יום ו׳, 12 באוק׳ 2018, 08:13 AM, מאת dotdv <notifications@github.com
…:
Added these examples under "instruments" (do you agree with this title or
have a better idea?) in "interesting examples".
Regarding example 3: I marked 'by' and 'using' separately as Rs. "he broke
the window [by_R using_R a hammer]_A
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#36 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIG86_--XsEkPJ-tBxArpChMZW-J1tI5ks5ukCT1gaJpZM4XDPY7>
.
|
Consider:
[He_A used_P [a hammer]_A [(He)_A to break_P [the window]_A]_A – this analysis seems reasonable, but I could also see an argument that "used" is a secondary verb.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: