Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

obj vs. iobj vs. obl in Catalan, Spanish and Italian for the verbs "agradar", "gustar" and "piacere" #290

Open
ftyers opened this issue Apr 23, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@ftyers
Copy link
Contributor

ftyers commented Apr 23, 2016

I've noticed what might be an inconsistency between how the verbs "agradar" (cat) and "gustar" (spa) are treated in Catalan and Spanish. In both languages they mean "like", and are used like "It likes to.me". In the Catalan treebank "to.me" gets the dobj label, while in the Spanish treebank, "to.me" gets the iobj label.

Other Romance languages: Portuguese has "gostar" which does not work the same way, and French has "aimer" which also does not. Italian has "piacere" which goes with iobj.

Spanish:

42      y       _       CONJ    _       _       35      cc      _       _
43      eso     _       PRON    _       Gender=Com|Number=Sing  45      nsubj   _       _
44      me      _       PRON    _       Gender=Com|Number=Sing|Person=1 45      iobj    _       _
45      gusta   _       VERB    _       Gender=Com|Number=Sing|Person=3|Mood=Ind|Tense=Pres     35      conj    _       _
46      .       _       PUNCT   _       _       1       punct   _       _

Catalan:

1       Li      ell     PRON    PRON    Case=Dat|Number=Sing|Person=3|PronType=Prs      2       dobj    _       _
2       agrada  agradar VERB    VERB    Mood=Ind|Number=Sing|Person=3|Tense=Pres|VerbForm=Fin   0       root    _       _
3       l'      el      DET     DET     Definite=Def|Number=Sing|PronType=Art   4       det     _       _
4       actualització   actualització   NOUN    NOUN    Gender=Fem|Number=Sing  2       nsubj   _       _
1       A       a       ADP     ADP     AdpType=Prep    4       case    _       _
2       tots    tot     DET     DET     Gender=Masc|Number=Plur|PronType=Ind    3       det     _       _
3       els     el      DET     DET     Definite=Def|Gender=Masc|Number=Plur|PronType=Art       4       det     _       _
4       actors  actor   NOUN    NOUN    Gender=Masc|Number=Plur 6       dobj    _       _
5       els     ell     PRON    PRON    Number=Plur|Person=3|PronType=Prs       6       dobj    _       _
6       agrada  agradar VERB    VERB    Mood=Ind|Number=Sing|Person=3|Tense=Pres|VerbForm=Fin   0       root    _       _
7       conèixer        conèixer        VERB    VERB    VerbForm=Inf    6       csubj   _       _
2       L'      el      DET     DET     Definite=Def|Number=Sing|PronType=Art   6       det     _       _
3       única   únic    ADJ     ADJ     Gender=Fem|Number=Sing  6       amod    _       _
4       que     que     PRON    PRON    PronType=Rel    6       dobj    _       _
5       m'      em      PRON    PRON    Number=Sing|Person=1|PronType=Prs       6       dobj    _       _
6       agrada  agradar VERB    VERB    Mood=Ind|Number=Sing|Person=3|Tense=Pres|VerbForm=Fin   10      csubj   _       _
7       veure   veure   VERB    VERB    VerbForm=Inf    6       csubj   _       _

Italian:

1       "       "       PUNCT   FB      _       4       punct   _       _
2       Non     non     ADV     BN      PronType=Neg    4       neg     _       _
3       mi      mi      PRON    PC      Number=Sing|Person=1|PronType=Clit      4       iobj    _       _
4       piace   piacere VERB    V       Mood=Ind|Number=Sing|Person=3|Tense=Pres|VerbForm=Fin   0       root    _       _
5       il      il      DET     RD      Definite=Def|Gender=Masc|Number=Sing|PronType=Art       12      det     _       _
6       suo     suo     DET     AP      Gender=Masc|Number=Sing|Poss=Yes|PronType=Prs   12      det:poss        _       _
7       voler   volere  AUX     VM      VerbForm=Inf    12      aux     _       _
8       essere  essere  VERB    V       VerbForm=Inf    12      cop     _       _
@jipatsaa
Copy link
Contributor

jipatsaa commented Apr 25, 2016

I think you are right, according to the DIEC (Diccionari De l'Institut
d'Estudis Catalans) or (Fábregas etal., 2012: 164), there are three
kind of psychological verbs depending on the syntactic position
occupied by the experiencer:

  • 1st type formed by verbs like témer (fear) , odiar (hate), estimar
    (appreciate)... where the experiencer is the subject
  • 2nd type formed by verbs like molestar (disturb) , espantar
    (scare),estimar (appreciate)... where the experiencer is the direct
    object
  • 3rd type formed by verbs like agradar (please), importar (matter)
    ... where the experiencer is the indirect object

Francis Tyers notifications@github.com erabiltzaileak idatzi du:

I've noticed what might be an inconsistency between how the verbs ...

@ftyers
Copy link
Contributor Author

ftyers commented Apr 25, 2016

I think that from the traditional grammatical sense, these are definitely iobj, however from a UD case, it isn't so clear. In terms of these verbs, they cannot have an "accusative" object, so, the experiencer here could be considered the "second most core argument after the subject" (as in the definition of dobj below).

It would be good to hear from the people making the treebanks, incidentally in Basque the experiencer of 'gustatu' gets iobj.)

dobj:

The direct object of a verb is the second most core argument of a verb after the subject. Typically, it is the noun phrase that denotes the entity acted upon or which undergoes a change of state or motion (the proto-patient).

iobj:

The indirect object of a verb is any nominal phrase that is a core argument of the verb but is not its subject or direct object. The prototypical example is the recipient of ditransitive verbs of exchange:

@hectormartinez
Copy link
Contributor

hectormartinez commented Apr 25, 2016

I prefer the dobj analysis, regardless of the experiencer being marked in
dative.

@jipatsaa
Copy link
Contributor

jipatsaa commented Apr 25, 2016

In the Basque treebank, and following several authors (Oyarzabal 2003,
Artiagoitia 1995, 2000) who analyzed Basque psychological verbs in the
past, we tagged the experiencer as iobj as next sentence shows.

1 Bikiei biki NOUN _ Case=Dat|Definite=Def|Number=Plur 3 iobj _ _
2 gehien gehien ADV _ _ 3 advmod _ _
3 gustatzen gustatu VERB _ Aspect=Imp|VerbForm=Inf 5 acl _ _
4 zaien izan AUX _ Mood=Ind|Number[abs]=Sing|Number[dat]=Plur|Person[abs]=3|Person[dat]=3 3 aux _ _
5 lekua leku NOUN _ Animacy=Inan|Case=Abs|Definite=Def|Number=Sing 7 nsubj _ _
6 sukaldeko sukalde NOUN _ Animacy=Inan|Case=Loc|Definite=Def|Number=Sing 7 nmod _ _
7 balkoia balkoi NOUN _ Animacy=Inan|Case=Abs|Definite=Def|Number=Sing 0 root _ _
8 da izan VERB _ Aspect=Prog|Mood=Ind|Number[abs]=Sing|Person[abs]=3 7 cop _ _
9 , , PUNCT _ _ 3 punct _ _

I hope it helps to clarify the reason for that decission.

Here one reference (B. Oyharçabal. Lexical causatives and causative
alternation in Basque. XLVI, Universitad del pais Vasco - Euskal
Herriko Unibertsitatea, pp.223-253, 2003):

Adhering to the typology usually applied to these verbs (Belleni &
Rizzi 1988),ahaztu and gustatu belong to the piacere type of
psych-verb (Artiagoitia 1995, 2000).
Such verbs do not admit a lexical causative alternation, as the
following examples show:
(9a) Adinarekin kantuak ahaztu zaizkit
age.COM song.PL.ABS forget AUX:3PL.1SG
"On account of age I have forgotten the songs."
(9b) * Adinak kantuak ahaztu dizkit
age.ERG song.PL.ABS forget AUX:3SG.3PL.l SG
*"Age has forgotten}TIe the songs."
(9b ') Adinak kantuak ahatzarazi dizkit
age.ERG song.PL.ABS forget.CAU AUX:3SG.3PL.1SG
"Age has made me forget the songs.

@jipatsaa
Copy link
Contributor

jipatsaa commented Apr 25, 2016

I guess that the definition

dobj:

The direct object of a verb is the second most core argument of a verb
after the subject. Typically, it is the noun phrase that denotes the entity
acted upon or which undergoes a change of state or motion (the
proto-patient).

comes from the thematic role hierarchy defended among others by Dowty
(1991) as a way to capture generalities. But psychological verbs are
complex in lexico-semantic terms, but in the romance treebanks you
mentioned they used "iobj", we also used it in Basque so I would say
that the description appearing in the UD "dobj" tag means to capture a

generalization that might not apply to certain psy verbs.

@dan-zeman dan-zeman added this to the lg-specific v2 milestone Nov 18, 2016
@dan-zeman dan-zeman modified the milestones: lg-specific v2, v2.2 Apr 24, 2018
@dan-zeman dan-zeman modified the milestones: v2.2, v2.4 Nov 13, 2018
@dan-zeman dan-zeman modified the milestones: v2.4, v2.5 Oct 6, 2019
@dan-zeman dan-zeman modified the milestones: v2.5, v2.6 Nov 9, 2019
@dan-zeman dan-zeman modified the milestones: v2.6, v2.7 May 14, 2020
@dan-zeman dan-zeman modified the milestones: v2.7, v2.8 Nov 14, 2020
@dan-zeman dan-zeman modified the milestones: v2.8, v2.9 Jun 17, 2021
@dan-zeman dan-zeman modified the milestones: v2.9, v2.11 Jun 13, 2022
@dan-zeman dan-zeman modified the milestones: v2.11, v2.13 May 29, 2023
@dan-zeman dan-zeman changed the title iobj and dobj in Catalan, Spanish and Italian for the verbs "agradar", "gustar" and "piacere" obj vs. iobj vs. obl in Catalan, Spanish and Italian for the verbs "agradar", "gustar" and "piacere" Nov 15, 2023
@dan-zeman
Copy link
Member

This issue was started under UD v1 guidelines, so dobj is now obj, but some of the inconsistencies still persist today (UD 2.13).

For agradar in Catalan, see this query: http://hdl.handle.net/11346/PMLTQ-NOAI. Pronominal experiencers are still often attached as obj because their form is ambiguous between dative and accusative. However, full nominals use the preposition a and they are obl:arg.

For gustar in Spanish AnCora, see this query: http://hdl.handle.net/11346/PMLTQ-R9HO. Pronominal experiencers are attached as obj even when they are unambiguously dative (le, les). They should probably be obl:arg because dative is not a core case in Spanish. Interestingly, me gusta is obl:arg although me could be dative or accusative. In Spanish GSD (query http://hdl.handle.net/11346/PMLTQ-RHM1), the experiencers are correctly obl:arg.

I suppose the experiencers of Italian piacere would also be best (most UD-way) analyzed as obl(:arg). I haven't checked all the Italian treebanks but the query for ISDT is http://hdl.handle.net/11346/PMLTQ-FOXO. Experiencers with preposition are obl here, bare pronouns are iobj (the pronouns are not annotated with the Case feature).

@dan-zeman dan-zeman modified the milestones: v2.13, v2.14 Nov 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants