Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

verta doesn't support pyYAML 5.4 version #2929

Closed
vineeth-shyam opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #2982
Closed

verta doesn't support pyYAML 5.4 version #2929

vineeth-shyam opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #2982
Assignees

Comments

@vineeth-shyam
Copy link

Hi team
In one of our project we are using verta==0.17.2 python library to connect to modelDB. In the last days we included Grype analysis in our pipeline to scan vulnerabilities, one such vulnerability was due an older version of pyYAML (GHSA-8q59-q68h-6hv4) whose version should be > 5.4.

However, I see that even the latest version of verta only supports pyYAML < 5.4.

Do you guys have any plans to release a patch to resolve this issue?

Thank you

@liuverta
Copy link
Contributor

liuverta commented Mar 9, 2022

Hi @vineeth-shyam, thank you for your interest in verta!

Our next release will support pyyaml<6.0 (the PR #2718 has already been merged). I can't provide an exact date at the moment, but we're working on having it published soon. Thank you for your patience—I'll let you when it's live.

@liuverta liuverta self-assigned this Mar 9, 2022
@vineeth-shyam
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much for your reply, @liuverta. I'm wondering do you guys have any tentative date for the new release?

@liuverta
Copy link
Contributor

liuverta commented Apr 4, 2022

Hi @vineeth-shyam, we are looking to release a new version 0.20.0 within the next couple of weeks!

@liuverta
Copy link
Contributor

liuverta commented Apr 8, 2022

@vineeth-shyam verta==0.20.0 should be pip-installable within the next hour, with support for PyYAML==5.4. Please let me know if you encounter any issues there. Thanks again for your patience!

@vineeth-shyam
Copy link
Author

Hi Liu,
Thank you very much for the update. I'm sorry I have to write you again, does the new release support click>=8.0?

Regards,
Vineeth

@liuverta
Copy link
Contributor

@vineeth-shyam We don't yet support click>=8.0; as I recall, there are some incompatibilities we would have to resolve.

If that is of interest to you, would you be so kind as to file a new Issue for that? I'd also be curious as to what other libraries require click>=8.0, if you know (I'm assuming that it's potentially causing dependency conflicts). Thank you!

@vineeth-shyam
Copy link
Author

Sure @liuverta I will create a new issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants