You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi I've noticed there're problematic sites added for V4 as well. Great work guys!
Just wondering if we can have an additional column for the particular setting (sequencing platforms, amplicon version..) that actually introduce the problematic sites. I mean there're should be common sites to mask but the ones using V3 or ONT might not need to mask the V4 sites?
This would give more options for the filtering to mask only sites of interest.
Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your message. We are currently investigating if there is a straight-forward way to add such flags to cross-reference problematic sites with amplicon primers in an automated and updateable manner. Thanks for the suggestion!
Hi I've noticed there're problematic sites added for V4 as well. Great work guys!
Just wondering if we can have an additional column for the particular setting (sequencing platforms, amplicon version..) that actually introduce the problematic sites. I mean there're should be common sites to mask but the ones using V3 or ONT might not need to mask the V4 sites?
This would give more options for the filtering to mask only sites of interest.
Thanks,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: