Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stuck on prep stage #14

Open
alicegodden opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Stuck on prep stage #14

alicegodden opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@alicegodden
Copy link

Hello,

I've run deviaTE and get stuck at the point of generation of .sam file. The script doesn't stop, and no errors are generated or anything in the log files.
I was wondering if it had anything to do with my fasta file. Do you have any advice on how to generate the TE fasta file for this pipeline please?

This is an example of how my file looks for Danio rerio GRCz11-
DNA|CMC-EnSpm|EnSpm-4N1_DR|EnSpm-4N1_DR_copy1||1|4190-4331 AATAATCTCAG....

This is the script I'm executing-
deviaTE --input_fq sample.fastq.gz --families DNA --library tes_devia.fasta --read_type phred+33

Or do you think it could it be an issue with my conda environment?
Thanks,
Alice

@W-L
Copy link
Owner

W-L commented Feb 2, 2024

Hi Alice,
Thanks for your message. If the program starts as expected I don't think it would be an issue with the conda environment or other aspects of the setup. The sample of the fasta file you shared does not look like a regulary-formatted fasta file though. It might have been caused by github formatting your message, but fasta files should look more like:

>header1
ACGTACGT...
>header2
ACGTACGT...
...

Would you mind checking your file again?
Lukas

@alicegodden
Copy link
Author

alicegodden commented Feb 3, 2024 via email

@W-L
Copy link
Owner

W-L commented Feb 6, 2024

Thanks!
One thing you could try is to deactivate the detection of internally deleted TEs. That is, if you are not specifically interested in them. You can turn off this feature by running deviaTE with --no_delet_detect. This deactivate one of the more complex parts of the code and should speed up the analysis.
Please let me know if this helps

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants