Non-preprint marked as pre-print

[carlinmack]

https://scholia.toolforge.org/work/Q102092244 is noted as a preprint, but is an erratum. Perhaps I messed up the SPARQL?

[fnielsen]

Yes, it seems I was a bit too fast accepting this. I thought we had a "preprint" property? But apparently no.

[carlinmack]

there is a preprint property (instance of preprint), but the thing to get the published version must be too general

[carlinmack]

To be honest, I'm not good enough with SPARQL to specify the ?statement must be a Q580922 (preprint)

?work p:P31 ?statement .
?statement pq:P642 ?pub .

I think I might need a psv:.

It would be good if the person that closes this could make an additional PR to add an "Erratum of:" row

[egonw]

It would be good if the person that closes this could make an additional PR to add an "Erratum of:" row

Yes, will fix this too. Also applies to retractions where it's also missing: