Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider Un-licensing #934

Open
Daniel-Mietchen opened this issue Nov 26, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Consider Un-licensing #934

Daniel-Mietchen opened this issue Nov 26, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation hopefully helpful explanations of how things work ethics-legal things related to ethical or legal issues P275-license things related to licensing

Comments

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Member

as per
https://unlicense.org/

@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link
Member Author

Licensing should be mentioned in the pull request template (cf. #943 ) and would involve a Contributor License Agreement workflow (cf. #962 )

@egonw
Copy link
Collaborator

egonw commented Dec 16, 2019

Personally, I'd be fine with contributions under the same license... unlicensing sounds an overkill. In fact, having contributions with the same open license reduces the chance that any of our universities decides to change the license to proprietary, and may better protect the open nature of Scholia than public domain.

@fnielsen
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request template and CLA are fine

@egonw egonw removed their assignment Feb 17, 2020
@Daniel-Mietchen Daniel-Mietchen added the ethics-legal things related to ethical or legal issues label Jul 12, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation hopefully helpful explanations of how things work ethics-legal things related to ethical or legal issues P275-license things related to licensing
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants