-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Resolve inconsistent recursive return for Diplomat::KV.get when singl… #120
Conversation
Not sure this is backward-compatible. I think it would break interface of non-recursive get. |
Yea I was thinking the same thing since it broke the spec tests and I would do a major version bump if/when this got merged. I am hoping to get the gem up to speed with the current API endpoints in Consul 0.7.2 ASAP before cutting a new release. |
This is so much needed, i would really love to see this getting fixed - major version bump is reasonable. Anything i can do to move this forward? Right now, i create dummy values in consul to avoid this bug... which is crazy |
@EugenMayer Well, quick workaround is to parse KV data yourself. |
@EugenMayer I just saw there was a major version bump in the past week, so I'm going to get this staged up and pushed out as 2.0.1 since I know this is really needed. In the next month or so, I plan to put some real TLC into this gem as I'll need it for an upcoming project. |
@EugenMayer I've rebased the changes onto the latest master branch, so if you could give this a quick +1 I'll move forward with getting this merged and released. |
i am so happy to have this one in, totally +1 |
@EugenMayer v2.0.1 has been tagged and released. enjoy! |
well this more or less has broken all diplomat integrations and i think the reason is, it does not play nice with "convert_to_hash" .. this is a huge issue. |
created #152 |
@EugenMayer could you provide more detail please? Are you comparing all diplomat integrations for the previous major revision, of do you mean the 2.0.1 release compared with 2.0.0? |
Thanks the issue answers my question |
…eAreFarmGeek#120)" This reverts commit e4b8878.
This reverts commit e4b8878 (WeAreFarmGeek#120).
…e value return
Resolves #119