Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

October 2022 Hybrid meeting agenda #1107

Closed
dtig opened this issue Sep 12, 2022 · 9 comments
Closed

October 2022 Hybrid meeting agenda #1107

dtig opened this issue Sep 12, 2022 · 9 comments

Comments

@dtig
Copy link
Member

dtig commented Sep 12, 2022

What should we discuss at the next in-person (with virtual attendance options) meeting? Please use this issue to add items you would like to discuss, and are interested in hearing about.

@fgmccabe
Copy link
Collaborator

  1. Would like to have a fiber switching session + vote
  2. Would like to get a vote on JSPI

@conrad-watt
Copy link
Contributor

Aiming to have a Threads to phase 3 vote (currently hacking away at the outstanding test suite requirements).

@tlively
Copy link
Member

tlively commented Sep 12, 2022

It would be good to do an update on GC progress since we entered phase 2. It's possible but unlikely that we'll be ready for a phase 3 vote. We'll know for sure closer to the meeting.

@ngzhian
Copy link
Member

ngzhian commented Sep 12, 2022

I can give an update on Relaxed SIMD, and potentially a poll for Phase 4.

@conrad-watt
Copy link
Contributor

Hi all, I've begun a list of items to be scheduled across the two days https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/main/main/2022/CG-10.md#items-to-be-assigned-slots

Anyone who's already proposed an item should suggest a tentative timebox and note any scheduling constraints. Anyone who would still like to propose an item can comment here or open a PR against the agenda linked above.

@titzer
Copy link
Contributor

titzer commented Sep 27, 2022

Can we add a logistical note to the page to put the Google office address (for those scheduling hotels)?

Thanks.

@titzer
Copy link
Contributor

titzer commented Sep 28, 2022

Also, I think we should have a slot devoted to talking about roadmap and strategy overall for Wasm. The format for the slot might be a panel or open discussion. Overall I'd like us to reestablish a shared sense of direction for the overall picture at a higher level than individual proposals.

@dtig
Copy link
Member Author

dtig commented Oct 4, 2022

@titzer, that sounds like a good idea. Do you have a structure, or some high level discussion points and a guess at a time allotment?

@titzer
Copy link
Contributor

titzer commented Oct 5, 2022

I think we should take at least 30 minutes and do it sort of like a round table.

A few key questions for discussion, off the top of my head:

  1. Who do we see as the key stakeholders (not in the room) that can benefit from Wasm?
  2. What are priorities for 2023 and beyond with Wasm?
  3. How should we balance depth (e.g. better penetration into the Web platform) versus breadth (new platforms) of influence?
  4. What are the good and bad parts of our process--what is working and what can be improved?

@dtig dtig closed this as completed Jul 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants