Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add references to WebIDL spec (normative) as well as Canvas, Webgl (Informative) #74

Closed
olivierthereaux opened this issue Sep 11, 2013 · 5 comments

Comments

@olivierthereaux
Copy link
Contributor

Originally reported on W3C Bugzilla ISSUE-23078 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:51:29 GMT
Reported by Olivier Thereaux
Assigned to

Suggested by Yves Lafon:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2013JulSep/0362.html

I noted that the reference sections are quite empty, it's missing some
important normative references as well as many informative ones.

As an example, WebIDL is used to describe things like [1], there are two
issues here:
1/ WebIDL is not in the normative references
2/ It is not clear which level of WebIDL conformance is required by the
specification for implementation (See [2] for the different conformance
classes available).

On the informative front, the abstract talks about canvas and webgl, good
candidates for informative refs.

[1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#OfflineAudioContext-section
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#conformance

@olivierthereaux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Original comment by paul@paul.cx on W3C Bugzilla. Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:01:42 GMT

When the action mentioned in 1 is done, maybe we should add 2 as an informative reference.

@cwilso cwilso added this to the Web Audio Last Call 1 milestone Oct 30, 2014
padenot added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 4, 2014
@padenot
Copy link
Member

padenot commented Nov 4, 2014

Most of it was done during the ReSpec refactoring, this adds a paragraph for WebIDL.

@padenot
Copy link
Member

padenot commented Nov 4, 2014

Maybe we could consider adding a section that state dependencies on other specs?

padenot added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 4, 2014
@cwilso
Copy link
Contributor

cwilso commented Nov 4, 2014

Separate from the references?

@padenot
Copy link
Member

padenot commented Nov 4, 2014

I don't know, I saw some other spec doing that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants