-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 958
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Several issues with new glossary implementation #5486
Comments
The explanation should be already available in the glossary panel. I will check rest later... |
It was properly saved, but later raised a permission error. Issue #5486
I'm felling like I'm pushing some keep-feedback-useful limit, adding more and more to the list... Feel free to tell me to stop or if you want it in some other format... |
It makes sense and is consistent with others. See #5486
It is more useful instead of edit (it was not present before). Issue #5486
There's also the small issue that there's nothing to indicate that the user is editing the glossary. It looks just like any other component. Even the glossary pane on the right hand side is displayed! (example) |
Correction: Actually it says "Glossary term", but that might be easily missed as evidenced above... |
It is more visible since 353ff0e. |
Thank you for your report; the issue you have reported has just been fixed.
|
I've noticed several relatively small issues in recent glossary reimplementation and its documentation. I don't feel like each of those deserves it's own bug report. Although I don't want them to get lost.
Describe the issues
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: