Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for .NET Standard 2.1 / .NET Core 3.1 #447

Closed
mc0re opened this issue Mar 27, 2020 · 8 comments
Closed

Add support for .NET Standard 2.1 / .NET Core 3.1 #447

mc0re opened this issue Mar 27, 2020 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@mc0re
Copy link

mc0re commented Mar 27, 2020

The biggest problem integrating WireMock with the new .NET is JSON parsers and ASP.NET - in particular, CodeAnalysis.CSharp package.

@StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

StefH commented Mar 27, 2020

I can make a specific .NET Standard 2.1 package, a .NET Core 3.x is not needed in that case.

Will this solve your issue?

About JSON : I currently use NewtonSoft and I think moving to new .NET Core JSON has too many code changes.

@StefH StefH added the feature label Mar 27, 2020
@mc0re
Copy link
Author

mc0re commented Mar 27, 2020 via email

@StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

StefH commented Mar 28, 2020

A preview version has been created (WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13032) which targets netstandard2.1 , can you test?

See also https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/MyGet-preview-versions

@mc0re
Copy link
Author

mc0re commented Mar 28, 2020 via email

@StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

StefH commented Mar 30, 2020

oleg-shilo/cs-script.core#7

@StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

StefH commented Mar 30, 2020

@mc0re & @igorquintaes
Can you please try new version from MyGet : WireMock.Net.1.2.2-ci-13091 ?

Maybe you still have to reference some library manually in your main project, I did not have time to test.

@StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

StefH commented Mar 31, 2020

@mc0re
Copy link
Author

mc0re commented Mar 31, 2020

Great, thanks!

@mc0re mc0re closed this as completed Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants