Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explore "Site Branding" patterns for Site Title, Site Logo, Site Tagline #34123

Closed
annezazu opened this issue Aug 17, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed
Labels
[Block] Site Logo Affects the Site Logo Block [Block] Site Tagline Affects the Site Tagline Block [Block] Site Title Affects the Site Title Block [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement.

Comments

@annezazu
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this address?

Both in writing the ninth call for testing for the FSE Outreach Program and in a recent item of feedback, it became clear that there might be an advantage to having theme blocks, like Site Title + Site Logo + Site Tagline, grouped in a way that makes them easier to quickly configure:

I mainly wanted to have the icon but up against the site title.

Right now doing something as simple as having the site logo next to the title is extremely difficult, despite that likely being a common user action.

What is your proposed solution?

Inspired by the Media & Text Block, I think it would be neat to have a "Site Branding" block (not sold on the name - just using it to convey the idea) that includes Site Title + Site Logo + Site Tagline together with different block variations that allow for different common layouts.

@annezazu annezazu added [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement. [Feature] Full Site Editing [Block] Site Title Affects the Site Title Block [Block] Site Tagline Affects the Site Tagline Block [Block] Site Logo Affects the Site Logo Block labels Aug 17, 2021
@ntsekouras
Copy link
Contributor

ntsekouras commented Aug 18, 2021

👋 - while this sounds like a common user need, I'm not sure creating a new block would be the best approach here. No strong opinions, but I think a couple of patterns would do the trick here. What do you think?

--cc @kjellr @jasmussen

@mtias
Copy link
Member

mtias commented Aug 18, 2021

Yes, I think there are many permutations for site title, logo, tagline, and navigation that the only way to handle properly is through patterns and better layout tools.

@kjellr
Copy link
Contributor

kjellr commented Aug 18, 2021

Right now doing something as simple as having the site logo next to the title is extremely difficult, despite that likely being a common user action.

Yeah, I think patterns are the simplest answer to this. Also, I expect this to get much easier (for both pattern creators and general users) once the flexbox features are more mature.

@annezazu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah yes! Patterns make perfect sense here. I'll retitle this around patterns for "site branding" instead. Thank you all for the direction.

@annezazu annezazu changed the title Explore a "Site Branding" block similar to Media & Text Block Explore "Site Branding" patterns for Site Title, Site Logo, Site Tagline Aug 18, 2021
@annezazu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Feedback came in during the FSE Outreach Program's all things media exploration on this same topic where the inability to get things to line up as one wanted in the header proved to be such a point of frustration with FSE. You can see this discussed in this user feedback video starting here. This further underscores how having patterns that show off different layouts will be hugely valuable to help folks quickly get what they want.

@annezazu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Going to close this out as we now have header and footer patterns, which include much of this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Block] Site Logo Affects the Site Logo Block [Block] Site Tagline Affects the Site Tagline Block [Block] Site Title Affects the Site Title Block [Type] Enhancement A suggestion for improvement.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants