Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update CODEOWNERS to use the new module naming convention #91

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 18, 2022

Conversation

JustinyAhin
Copy link
Member

Fixes #23. Follows up on #23 (comment).

This PR update the CODEOWNERS file to reflect the module naming convention. It also updates the code owners based on the latest changes on the focus spreadsheet.

@JustinyAhin JustinyAhin added Infrastructure Issues for the overall performance plugin infrastructure no milestone PRs that do not have a defined milestone for release [Type] Feature A new feature within an existing module labels Jan 17, 2022
Copy link
Member

@felixarntz felixarntz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JustinyAhin Looks good, just one tiny suggestion to "technically" complete this.

.github/CODEOWNERS Show resolved Hide resolved
@JustinyAhin
Copy link
Member Author

One last thing @felixarntz. Should I add you as owner for /tests/admin?

@felixarntz
Copy link
Member

@JustinyAhin Yeah, probably best if you add both of us since that should IMO be the same as the production code for that, which falls into Infrastructure.

@JustinyAhin JustinyAhin merged commit 1eeb19d into trunk Jan 18, 2022
@tillkruss tillkruss deleted the fix/23-codeowners-file branch March 7, 2022 19:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Infrastructure Issues for the overall performance plugin infrastructure no milestone PRs that do not have a defined milestone for release [Type] Feature A new feature within an existing module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Set up code owners
2 participants