Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is the implications of format 0.15 to 2.1 change #296

Closed
vsrawat opened this issue Sep 21, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

What is the implications of format 0.15 to 2.1 change #296

vsrawat opened this issue Sep 21, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@vsrawat
Copy link

vsrawat commented Sep 21, 2019

Today, after updating to new release, when I loaded my json files, I got a message to the effect that these files are old format 0.15 that will become supported in future, I should load version 2.1

What change is that?
Where can I get information on version 2.1?

As the older version is still running,

  1. does it mean that newer version is not yet applied and we can't load 2.1 version files till that is implemented?
  2. or does it mean that currently both 0.15 as well as 2.1 versions are working and we can change our files to newer version and load immediately?

Thanks.
newer version

@Woundorf
Copy link
Owner

I just added a version check in the latest version thinking about users that keep lists in older formats for a long time (like you in this case). That message means that this format is still supported but it is not the latest one and thus support for it may be removed in some future version if it becomes too hard to maintain.

You can just export the list after importing a file and it will be saved with the latest format (2.1 at this moment). The difference is a new field for each group called "mode". As explained in the changelog:

Added 3 modes for substitution groups (#206):

  • auto: used in auto-replace on load and auto-replace every n seconds
  • manual: used when manually applying the substitution list
  • auto&manual (default): used in both cases, equivalent to previous versions

I don't remember if you are the user that generates lists with a spreadsheet, if that's the case then you should update it to add that field.

@vsrawat
Copy link
Author

vsrawat commented Sep 25, 2019 via email

@vsrawat
Copy link
Author

vsrawat commented Sep 30, 2019 via email

@vsrawat
Copy link
Author

vsrawat commented Oct 7, 2019 via email

@Woundorf
Copy link
Owner

Sorry for the delayed response.

  1. Please confirm if this is the only change in previous and newer versions?

Yes, it's the only change.

  1. What If I put this change in files of earlier versions also? I mean will fr (earlier releases of fr) not import such files and will throw an error, or will fr still import and will just ignore the "mode" line, or will import and keep it but will not use it?

It would be ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants