Drastically improve steal speed for mixed inventories #51
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Should be good now, tested it a few different ways,. |
|
I just noticed this was still open, sorry! |
TheGrandCurator
referenced
this pull request
in TheGrandCurator/Cheddar-BratWurst7
Mar 27, 2022
Drastically improve steal speed for mixed inventories #51
|
This pull request has been open for a while with no recent activity. If you're still working on this or waiting for a review, please add a comment or commit within the next 7 days to keep it open. Otherwise, the pull request will be automatically closed to free up time for other tasks. Pull requests should be closed if:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checks if the item can be put into the slot before waiting on the delay, this drastically improves timing.
Note that this code was manually edited on github as it came from my revised fork which uses separate formatting - it will compile but in the offchance I missed something just let me know.