Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade sigstore from 1.5.2 to 1.6.0 #1

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

X-oss-byte
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade sigstore from 1.5.2 to 1.6.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2023-06-06.
Release notes
Package name: sigstore
  • 1.6.0 - 2023-06-06

    Minor Changes

    • 5ea8b63: Adds a new identityProvider config option for the sign/attest functions
    • 16de8c7: Support for verifying Rekor entries w/ the new dsse entry type

    Patch Changes

    • 4fdf826: Consume TUF client from @ sigstore/tuf package
    • f72e2b2: Consume Rekor API types from @ sigstore/rekor-types package
    • 84fd931: Export IdentityProvider interface
    • Updated dependencies [29b88a3]
    • Updated dependencies [3e770f0]
      • @ sigstore/tuf@1.0.0
  • 1.5.2 - 2023-05-16

    Patch Changes

    • 2f89e43: Update Fulcio client to handle responses with detached SCTs
from sigstore GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: sigstore

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants